No doubt it is the quest for funding for what are “fashionable” projects which leads to this kind of rubbish. This is not even worthy of being called pseudo science – this is just nonscience (pun intended).
We find that an increase in a state’s unemployment rate decreases Google searches for “global warming” and increases searches for “unemployment,” and that the effect differs according to a state’s political ideology.
This is is what passes for science for University of California economists Matthew Kahn and Matthew Kotchen in their peer-reviewed paper (abstract here) “Environmental Concern and the Business Cycle: The Chilling Effect of Recession”.
Apparently this is funded by the National Bureau of Economic Research. Clearly they have surplus funds to disseminate, or was it the trigger words “Environmental Concern” which loosened the purse strings.
image
Does it really take two University economists to come to the conclusion that
Finally, in California, we find that an increase in a county’s unemployment rate is associated with a significant decrease in county residents choosing the environment as the most important policy issue.
One wonders who the peers who reviewed this article and recommended publication could be — and are they getting any funding from the NBER?
Tags: climate change, economics, global warming, pseudo-science
September 20, 2010 at 7:28 am
[…] are funny people. Look at how this new paper is attacked here . This intellectual has not bothered to read our paper but he has an opinion. I would like to […]