The k2p blog

The height of arrogance is when I am told by someone else that I should do something or not do something “for your own good”.

Be it a doctor or a lawyer or an environmental campaigner or a civil servant or a politician or a government,  the phrase raises my hackles.

It presumes too much.

It does not convince.

It is dictatorial.

It imposes one person’s values on someone else.

It is a denial of the subject’s most deep-seated and fundamental value of deciding what constitutes “good”.

I am inclined to think that the most fundamental human characteristic is that

any – and every – human can determine what is “good”

The needs of others and surrounding society and definitions of basic human rights can circumscribe this but cannot – by diktat – take away this fundamental value which is I think integral to being an individual. By corollary any entity which cannot decide what is good and then distinguish between “good” and “bad” does not then qualify for the label “human individual”.

This leads me to paraphrase Descartes’

“cogito ergo sum” (I think, therefore I am)  

to be instead:

I decide what is “good” and can distinguish that which is “bad”.

Therefore I am.

Tags: Cogito ergo sum, definition of an individual, Descartes, for your own good, Human Rights and Liberties, Philosophy, Values

This entry was posted on July 10, 2011 at 9:44 am and is filed under Behaviour, Philosophy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.