There has always been an aura of romance about our ancient hunter-gatherer forbears. The term “noble savage” ( “bon sauvage”) only dates back to 1672 but the concept gained ground in the 18th and 19th centuries and the idea of “nature’s gentlemen” flourished in the sentimentality of that time. Jean M Auel’s hugely successful Earths Children series also paints a picture of rather noble hunter-gatherers. Hunters are of course intrinsically heroic and appending “gatherers” to their description does not take too much away. The heroic stature is only dissipated when we become fully settled agriculturists – mere farmers – in the Holocene. Farmer’s don’t conjure up images of nobility and heroism and of course when humans became traders they also get greed and deviousness added to their image.
But there is no perceived nobility or honor in scavenging. It is the image of the hyena versus that of the lion. But long before we became hunter-gatherers we were scroungers and scavengers. New archaeological findings indicates that we were hunter-scavengers some 2 million years ago. And we were scavengers before that and scroungers when we first split from the chimps.
Ferraro JV, Plummer TW, Pobiner BL, Oliver JS, Bishop LC, et al. (2013) Earliest Archaeological Evidence of Persistent Hominin Carnivory. PLoS ONE 8(4): e62174. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062174
My imagined time-line for the various phases of human development then becomes:
- 8 million YBP Human Chimpanzee divergence – Scroungers
- 4 million YBP Bipedalism – Scavengers
- 2 million YBP Stone tools – Hunter-scavengers
- 600,000 YBP Archaic Human – Neanderthal divergence
- 200,000 YBP Hunting teams, herd followers Hunter-nomads
- 60,000 YBP Semi-permanent dwellings, Hunter-gatherers
- 11,500 YBP Settled agriculture Farmers
- 5,000 YBP Mercantile expansions Merchant-soldiers
Tags: Holocene, Hunter-gatherer, phases of human development, Scavenging
May 10, 2013 at 11:50 pm
I believe there is evidence that we were power scavengers, Isn’t there? Its been a while since my studies in anthropology, but aren’t there remains of prey that could only be hunted by large predators with cutting marks in the bone to indicate humans likely scared away predators from their kill (with throwing stones and swinging ‘bats’). I know that it is likely we used to live off of fatty bone marrow from the remains, but isn’t there evidence in our ancestor’s bone structure that indicates we used our throwing and ‘bat’-striking muscles moreso than the pre-homo ancestors did? I’d like to think of us at least as aggressive scavengers 🙂 Great post.
May 11, 2013 at 6:01 am
My only point – apart from the presumed “nobility” of various behaviours – is that after we adopted bipedalism there was probably a long period of scavenging kills made by other species before developing the capabilities of making our own kills.
ktwop