The domain of science
There are many questions that science cannot even address, let alone, answer. The process we call “science” starts with many fundamental assumptions (existence and causality for example). Clearly the needs of what we take to be logic require that any field of thought (science in this case) can not penetrate or address its own founding assumptions. It would seem that space, time, matter, energy, life and consciousness are also such assumptions. The scientific method, while incredibly powerful, is inherently limited by its foundational assumptions. Questions like the existence of reality itself, the nature of consciousness, or the ultimate origin of the universe are beyond the scope of scientific inquiry. There are other areas that science cannot directly address:
- The laws of logic: While science relies on logic to draw conclusions, it cannot prove the validity of logic itself.
- The uniformity of nature: The assumption that natural laws are consistent across space and time is fundamental to scientific investigation, but it cannot be proven.
- The objectivity of observation: Science assumes that observations can be made objectively, but human perception and interpretation can introduce biases. All human observations are ultimately subjective.
- The existence of an external world: While we experience the world as real, the nature of reality itself is a philosophical question that science cannot definitively answer.
Mysteries and unanswerable questions lead to the invention of gods and supernatural beings by humans. Initially they are just labels for the answers to the unanswerable questions. (Of course they are later imbued with human characteristics, supernatural powers, families and expanded regions of influence). The process we call science, though, does not (can not) address the unanswerable questions. Setting science and the gods in opposition is incorrect in logic and in reason. Claiming that “science denies gods” or that “gods are unscientific” are statements that are invalid. Science seeks to explain the natural world through empirical evidence and falsifiable hypotheses. Science simply operates within its own framework, and it doesn’t have the tools to prove or disprove the existence of supernatural beings. Religion addresses questions of meaning, purpose, and the supernatural, which often lie beyond the domain of scientific inquiry.
Gods can only be imagined, conceived of and invented in those domains where science cannot reach.
It is my contention that while philosophers (thinkers) may have formulated the mysteries which then could only be “solved” by the invention of a god, that it was politically motivated groups (possibly the earliest priests) who used such gods to create religions as a social control tool. So it seems probable that the invention of gods preceded the invention of religions (though gods are not always needed by religions). The invention of gods likely stemmed from a combination of factors:
- Humans abhor the unknown: Humans, ever since they became human, have sought explanations for all they couldn’t understand. Gods were labels for the answers to the unanswerable. They provided answers to the impossible questions like “Why does the sun rise?”, “Why does it rain?” or “Where do we go after death?”
- Social Control: Gods and their supernatural powers were used to justify and establish social norms and laws. Disobeying divine rules could lead to just punishment, both in this life and the afterlife.
- Creating a social “we”: Shared beliefs in gods fostered a sense of unity and belonging within communities. Rituals and ceremonies centered around gods strengthened social bonds.
- As a means of explaining and withstanding loss and suffering: Gods or purported sins against the gods could justify and explain misfortune and suffering as divine tests or punishments. They provided a sense of purpose and meaning.
- As a crutch giving hope and comfort: Gods were used as a vehicle of hope for a better future, both in this life and the afterlife. They provided comfort and solace in times of hardship.
In essence, gods served as a powerful tool for explaining the unexplainable, maintaining social order, creating communities and providing psychological comfort.
November 25, 2024 at 11:53 pm
and since there has never been an answer from supernatual nonsense, there are no gods.
November 26, 2024 at 8:52 am
Really?
For me Gods are a label for the unknown answers to the Great Mysteries.
If you vest them with supernatural powers then they become nonsense. If you give them a nonsense definition then they are nonsense.
Most of the Gods of Science are alive and well. The God of Gravity, the God of Random Interactions, the God of Singularities, the God of the One Quantum Wave Function to Rule them All, the God of Life and the God of Consciousness. The God of the Big Bang has now been replaced by the God of Inflation and the God of Singularities. It is thought the Gods of Space and Time are in a relationship. But some Gods are dead. The God of String Theory is on life support. The God of Dark Matter is dead. The God of Dark Energy is hanging on.
The foundations of science are beliefs. The beliefs of science are the Gods of today.
The Great Mysteries remain mysteries (existence, time, space, matter, energy, causality, life and consciousness).