Measurement standards which can no longer be touched or seen or felt….

I have a sense of loss.

The Royal Society was home to a conference on 24th and 25th to consider how to bring the kilogram – the last of the seven base units of measurement – into line with the other six. This meeting was to discuss proposals of defining the kilogram in terms of the “fundamental” constants and to move away from using a lump of metal stored very carefully as the standard of mass.  The first General Conference on Weights and Measures was held in 1889 and meets every 4 years. The 24th Conference will be held in October this year and will table a proposal for the new definition of the kilogram. Then by the 25th Conference in 2015 the new definition may be adopted.

And when this happens there will no longer be any standard of measure left which can be seen or touched or felt. There will no longer be a King’s foot to refer to or an “Iron Ulna of our Lord the King” to signify a yard or some standard stones stored carefully to represent mass. The Mètre des Archives gave way to the International Prototype Metre.  The Imperial Standard Yard like the IPM was the distance between markings on specified bars of metal carefully stored. By 2015 all these standard definitions may be based only on the “fundamental constants” of nature (in the hope that they will truly remain constant across the reaches of space and time).

The International System of Units (SI) defines seven units of measure as a basic set from which all other SI units arederived. These SI base units and their physical quantities are:

  • metre for length
  • kilogram for mass
  • second for time
  • ampere for electric current
  • kelvin for temperature
  • candela for luminous intensity
  • mole for the amount of substance.
The seven SI base units and the interdependency of their definitions: for example

The seven SI base units and the interdependency of their definitions: for example

There used to be a time when measurements could be easily related to. Length and mass (weight) and light and temperature were all given units which were of practical and everyday use.

A candle-power was the light from one candle, a foot was a foot, an inch was either the width of your thumb or the distance from the tip of your index finger to the first knuckle, and a grain was the mass of a barley-corn. Water froze at zero °C and it boiled at one hundred divisions higher at 100 °C. Alternatively Daniel Fahrenheit set zero ° F to be the coldest stable temperature he could reach with a particular brine solution (ice, water and ammonium chloride which is a frigorific mixture) and he set 100 °F to the temperature of his wife’s armpit. Later others set the boiling point of water  to be exactly 180 divisions higher than the zero at 212 °F. This resulted in normal body temperature now becoming 98.6 °F instead of the 100. The point at which water freezes then happened to be 32 divisions higher than the zero. A comfortable temperature – inside or out – was 80 °F while 60 °F was chilly and 100 °F was on a hot day. A year was set by the seasons and the sun and the month was set by the moon. An average day was set by the sun rising and setting and this day was divided up – arbitrarily – into days and nights of 12 parts each and each part was further divided into 60 and 60 again – probably first by the Babylonians. It is only in our times that we have needed to split the second and anachronistically these further subdivisions of the second follow the metric system with milliseconds and microseconds and nanoseconds. A mile used to be 1000 paces (2 steps with a pace being a left step and a right step) of a standard Roman legionary.

But science and industry have moved on. Machines and instruments and medicine and electronics and computers and going to the moon can no longer manage with the old rules and measures of  everyday living.

From the purpose of the meeting at the  Royal Society:

From the origins of the metric system, when the metre was a fraction of the arc of the Paris meridian and the kilogram the weight of a cubic decimetre of water, the ultimate goal has been a system of measurement based on invariant quantities of nature. After more than 200 years we are now within reach of achieving this. While the kilogram is still defined as the mass of a Pt-Ir cylinder kept in a vault in Sèvres, serious plans now exist to redefine the kilogram by fixing the numerical value of the Planck constant h; and the ampere, kelvin and mole by fixed numerical values for e, k and NA. With the metre already being defined by the speed of light and the second by an atomic microwave transition, but likely soon to be redefined by an optical transition of much higher frequency, we shall have at last achieved what the savants of the 18th century had sought.

Today all the units except the kilogram are defined by natural constants:

  1. The metre is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second with the speed of light in a vacuum being the natural constant. (And I can’t help wondering if this will remain constant under changing gravity conditions or the changing state of the expanding – or contracting – universe).
  2. The second is the duration of 9 192 631 770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom at rest at a temperature of 0 K.
  3. The ampere is that constant current which, if maintained in two straight parallel conductors of infinite length, of negligible circular cross-section, and placed 1 metre apart in vacuum, would produce between these conductors a force equal to 2 × 10−7newton per metre of length.
  4. The kelvin, unit of thermodynamic temperature, is the fraction 1/273.16 of the thermodynamic temperature of thetriple point of water having the isotopic composition defined exactly by the following amount of substance ratios: 0.000 155 76 mole of2H per mole of 1H, 0.000 379 9 mole of 17O per mole of 16O, and0.002 005 2 mole of 18O per mole of 16O.
  5. The mole is the amount of substance of a system which contains as many elementary entities as there are atoms in 0.012 kilogram of carbon 12 where unbound atoms of carbon 12, at rest and in their ground state, are referred to.
  6. The candela is the luminous intensity, in a given direction, of a source that emits monochromatic radiation of frequency 540 × 1012 hertz and that has a radiant intensity in that direction of 1/683 watt per steradian.

The plan is to base the kilogram on the Planck constant .


A computer-generated image of the International Prototype kilogram (IPK): Wikipedia

Physics World reports

In the current system, the kilogram, ampere, kelvin and the mole are all linked to exact numerical values of the mass of the international prototype kilogram in Paris, the permeability of the vacuum, the triple-point temperature of water, and to the molar-mass of carbon-12 respectively. The plan is to change all that so that these four units are linked to exact numerical values of the Planck constant, the charge of the electron, the Boltzmann constant and to the Avogadro constant respectively.

All of this is no doubt a great advance and necessary but I have difficulty to relate to the new definitions. I cannot invoke any image of 9 192 631 770 periods of a radiation or the 299 792 458th part of a second and I feel that something is being lost……

Tags: , , , , , ,

2 Responses to “Measurement standards which can no longer be touched or seen or felt….”

  1. Wtrmute Says:

    Allow me to try and allay your fears, good sir: First, in regards to there not being any standard of measure which can be “seen, touched or felt”: The situation as it is today is not very different from what you describe: Sure, there is a lump of Platinum-Iridium surrounded by two evacuated glass coverings inside a safe in Sèvres. Notice that, when you went to Wikipedia to look for images of the prototype, what you actually got was a computer-generated simulation of what the prototype looks like rather than a direct picture of the actual thing. That is because it is hardly ever touched, except to compare it to one of several copies stored with various metrology institutes around the world.

    It’s guarded this carefully because otherwise the piece could, over the decades, actually gain or lose mass because the outer surface oxides or is worn away by handling, and then what will we compare our standards to? If we compare all lengths to an iron ell or a King’s yard, and the aforementioned artefact expands thermally in the Summer and contracts in the Winter, what is the true length of the yard or the ell? What we need is to compare against something which we know will not change size regardless of the temperature or the humidity or however many times we actually use it to calibrate our rulers, clocks and scales.

    And this is the beauty of using fundamental constants of nature. The speed of light in a vacuum doesn’t get slower or faster no matter how many lasers you use to measure the size of a metre. The time the hyperfine states of Caesium take to switch between each other doesn’t change if you count them out however many times you like. Obviously, you won’t measure the second directly by counting hyperfine transitions, unless you’re measuring the time with an actual Caesium clock.

    In fact, when we talk about defining such and such unit according to a fundamental constant, we’re actually talking about taking a current method of measuring out the associated quantity — a Caesium clock in the case of time, a laser pulse in the case of length, possibly a Watt balance in the case of mass — and giving it sanctioned status as *the* method of measuring that unit. These measuring methods are then implemented independently by the respective countries’ standards bodies and used to create the secondary standards — chronometres, metre sticks, bathroom scales — which we actually use to measure with, safe in the knowledge that if we think they are miscalibrated, we can always go and measure them against a truly authoritative source which will remain authoritative no matter how many seasons pass.

    Finally, regarding your fears that the fundamental constants of nature actually vary, cosmologists have probed the very edges of the observable Universe and the remotest past upon which there is any possibility of seeing anything at all, and as far as they have the resolution to measure, the fundamental constants had then the same values as they do now. That is to say, if the fundamental constants of nature (c, G, hbar, epsilon-zero and k) do vary, they do so minutely that we might as well take them for constants, since we can’t actually measure their variation. That also means they will continue to vary beneath our ability to sense it, or physics as we know it would have already changed drastically in the past 13.5 billion years.

    So rest assured, even though we will not be able to “see, hear and touch” the associated standards, they will be even more accessible to the people than they have ever been when they were material artefacts stored by a given government.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: