P. Gosselin at No Tricks Zone is quite right in pointing out the enormous political problems in now admitting that the global warming hypothesis which has been accepted dogma for 3 decades may not be correct after all.
The big question now circulating through the stunned European media, governments and activist organisations is how could the warming stop have happened? Moreover, how do we now explain it to the public?
His recent posts got me to making the parallels between the AGW climate “scientists” and Lance Armstrong.
Both
- have posed as heroes “saving” the world / sport
- have promoted dogma based on lies for many years,
- have made fortunes in the process,
- have lied and cheated to maintain the initial fraud,
- have attacked and tried to destroy those who would disclose their fraud,
- have – on the side – led to some good work along the way (in cancer research and in many disciplines connected to climate), and
- will come out of the cesspit smelling of roses
I wonder if the Nobel Peace Committee could revoke their decision and if Al Gore and the IPCC could be stripped of their Nobel prize? They can both afford to give the money back.
Lance Armstrong, Livestrong And Climate Research
Tags: climate change, climate models, doped models, global warming fraud, Lance Armstrong
The k2p blog 