Posts Tagged ‘air strikes’

Two months of Russian air strikes on ISIS more effective than 14 months of US efforts

December 2, 2015

If the Russian supported advances of the Syrian government continue at the present rate, the US-led coalition and the rebels they support may not have too much to say when a Syria, sans ISIS, is carved up. The Russians, regime Syrians, the Kurds and Iran will settle it among themselves. Now this may just be the Russian / Syrian propaganda line, but I suspect that there is some truth in it. Yesterday it was announced that the rebels (mainly al Nusra) would be evacuated from Homs under UN supervision as the Syrian government forces would cease their siege and take over.

I note that the US is now talking about US boots on the ground to support the “good” rebels and this is, I think, a response to a fear of being left out and left behind. Certainly the difference in effectiveness of one month two months of Russian air strikes – with a strategy –  compared to 14 months of US and coalition air strikes, but without a strategy, seems quite remarkable.

Sky:

Bashar al Assad has said US-led coalition bombing in Syria helped Islamic State to expand and recruit fighters.

….. But he praised military action by his ally Russia, which has been accused of targeting moderate rebels as well as jihadists.

Mr Assad said: “Since the beginning of that (US-led) coalition, if you want to talk about facts, not opinion, since the beginning of that coalition, ISIS (Islamic State group) has expanded and the recruiting from around the world has increased.

“While since the participation of Russia in the same fight, so-called against terrorism, ISIS has been shrinking. And al-Nusra (Nusra Front) of course and the other terrorist groups. So this is reality. The facts are telling.”

Asked what it would take to end Syria’s four-year civil war, which has killed more than 200,000 people, Mr Assad said: “When those countries that I mentioned – France, UK, US, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and some other – stop supporting those terrorists.

“(the next) day the situation will be better and in a few months we will have full peace in Syria, definitely. If they stop.”

The US, UK, and other Western powers fighting Islamic State have demanded that Mr Assad steps down and have backed rebel groups fighting his forces.

Meanwhile the Syrian president has referred to all his opponents as “terrorists” and accused world leaders pushing for his departure of “supporting terrorists”.

The Syrian leader is backed by Russia and Iran and he praised Vladimir Putin for launching a bombing campaign backing Assad’s forces in September.

In a wide-ranging interview with Czech TV, Mr Assad also said: 

:: On The Migration Crisis:

“The feeling is very sad. Especially if you think about every person of those Syrians who left Syria has sad story behind him. It reflects the hardship of the Syrians during the crisis. From this (rational) way of looking at the situation, it’s a loss. Every one of those is a human resources that left Syria. So that will undermine. Undermine your society and your country. Definitely. But at the end we have to deal with the reasons.”

:: On Turkey Downing A Russian Jet:

“I think it has shown the real intention of Erodgan (Turkish President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan) who, let’s say, lost his nerve because the Russian intervention has changed the balance on the ground. So the failure of Erdogan in Syria, the failure of his terrorist groups means his political demise.”

:: On Relations With The West:

“If you look at the relation with the West, in 2005 I was the killer. In 2008 and after I was a peacemaker. Then in 2011 I became the vulture. Now, there’s some positive change – of course shy kind of change, not the explicit one.” ……..

I think the Russian air strikes have caught the US and, especially, Turkey, flat-footed. The shooting down of the Russian jet by Turkey seems to have been born out of a frustration at the targeting of the lucrative oil trade between Turkish middle-men and ISIS (and Erdogan’s son is said to be a key player here), but perhaps more importantly at the success of the Kurds.

Kill rates from police action and air-strikes

May 31, 2015

The juxtaposition of domestic police shootings in the US and the effectiveness of air strikes in Syria is only because I read one article soon after the other. But numbers always tell a tale – even if it is obscure.

  • Domestic US deaths by police shooting: 385 in 5 months (kill rate 77/month)
  • ISIS fighters killed in Syria by US air strikes: 2217 in 8 months (kill rate 277/month)

I don’t know if any conclusions are justified because, to me, the one seems much higher than it ought to be and the other seems too low. But one observation I have is that kill rate – as a Key Performance Indicator (KPI) – should be maximised in a war but minimised in policing.

Washington Post: 30th May.

Fatal police shootings in 2015 approaching 400 nationwide

……. The three are among at least 385 people shot and killed by police nationwide during the first five months of this year, more than two a day, according to a Washington Post analysis. That is more than twice the rate of fatal police shootings tallied by the federal government over the past decade, a count that officials concede is incomplete.

IB Times: 25th May:

US-Led Airstrikes in Syria Kill 2,217 Isis Fighters

 ….. At least 2,217 Islamic State fighters, mostly European nationals, have been killed in the last eight months by the US-led airstrikes on Isis targets in Syria, a monitoring agency reported.

According to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a high number of Isis casualities were reported from Homs, Hama, al Hasakah, Raqqa, Der Ezzor, and Aleppo.

In total, 2,440 people have been killed since the beginning (September 2014) of the US-led coalition airstrikes on Syria.

According to the estimates provided by the International Center for the Study of Radicalisation, a think tank at King’s College London, at least 3,300 Western Europeans and 100 US citizens are believed to have joined the Islamic State.

In one estimate around 700,000 people are killed worldwide by violent, non-war related, events every year. Currently my guesstimate is that around 300,000 may be the death toll due to war. Since the crude mortality rate is about 56 million (8/1000 of population) every year, it follows that about 2% of all deaths are due to the violence of man upon man.

But it also means that among our 7 billion we have about 50 million people who have, by violence, caused the death of another human.