Posts Tagged ‘Jeffrey Epstein’

Update: Epstein files and Scandinavia

February 13, 2026

@grok Summarise further developments regarding the Epstein files and the Scandinavian fallout.


There have been significant further developments in the Scandinavian fallout from the Epstein files since early February 2026, particularly in Norway, where the scandal has intensified with resignations, ongoing police investigations, parliamentary inquiries, and mounting pressure on the royal family. Sweden and Denmark have seen more limited additional fallout, with no major new resignations or probes reported beyond earlier ones.

The U.S. Department of Justice’s release of over 3 million pages of documents (starting late January 2026) continues to drive scrutiny across Europe, but Norway has been hit hardest among Scandinavian countries, with multiple high-profile figures implicated in financial ties, emails, visits, and potential corruption.

Norway (Most Intense Fallout)
Norway has experienced a “political storm,” with investigations expanding and public confidence in institutions (including the monarchy and foreign ministry) under strain.

Crown Princess Mette-Marit:
– New details revealed extensive post-2008 contact (nearly 1,000 mentions), including emails joking about inappropriate topics, planning visits to Epstein properties, and her borrowing his Palm Beach home in 2013.
– She issued multiple apologies in early February, expressing “deepest regret” for the friendship, calling it “embarrassing,” and specifically apologizing to King Harald and Queen Sonja for the situation she put the royal family in.
– Pressure has mounted, with charities reviewing or cutting ties, public questions about her suitability as future queen, and Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre calling for more transparency while agreeing she showed “poor judgment.”
– No resignation or abdication, but combined with her stepson Marius Borg Høiby’s ongoing rape/assault trial (unrelated but amplifying royal scrutiny), it’s described as a potential “split” in the family and the biggest modern crisis for the Norwegian royals.

Mona Juul (Diplomat):
– Initially suspended (early February), she resigned as Norway’s ambassador to Jordan and Iraq around February 9, 2026, after revelations of ties, including Epstein’s will bequeathing $10 million to her and husband Terje Rød-Larsen’s children (signed shortly before his death).
– Norwegian Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide cited a “serious lapse in judgment.”
– Ongoing ministry investigation into her knowledge/contact with Epstein.

Terje Rød-Larsen (her husband, former diplomat/UN envoy):
– Under police investigation for complicity in gross corruption (alongside Juul) by Økokrim (Norway’s economic crime unit), announced February 9, 2026.
– Files show visits to Epstein’s island (2011 with family), dinners (including 2019 in Paris), and financial dealings.

Thorbjørn Jagland (former PM, Nobel Committee chair, Council of Europe secretary-general):
– Police opened an “aggravated corruption” investigation (early February), including home searches (reported February 12).
– Council of Europe waived his immunity at Norway’s request to allow legal processes.
– Ties include emails, gifts/loans/benefits from Epstein during his Nobel/COE roles.

Broader Norwegian Actions:
– Parliament appointed a rare external inquiry into the Foreign Ministry’s Epstein links (around February 10).
– Økokrim confirmed comprehensive, long-term probes into multiple figures.
– Other mentions (e.g., former FM Børge Brende attending post-conviction dinners) but no major new fallout.

Sweden
Joanna Rubinstein (former chair of Sweden for UNHCR): Resigned February 2, 2026, after files showed her 2012 family visit to Epstein’s island (post-conviction) and a thankful email. No further developments; she distanced herself, calling abuses “horrific.”
Princess Sofia: Broke silence around February 10–11, addressing “a couple” of encounters/meetings but denying deeper involvement. Royal court maintains denials; no resignation or probe.
No new major resignations, investigations, or business/political fallout reported.

Denmark
Mentions of King Frederik (as former Crown Prince) in 2012 emails remain downplayed/denied by the royal family.
No confirmed resignations, investigations, or significant new revelations tied to Danish figures. Rumors about business leaders/politicians persist online but lack substantiation in reports.


The scandal has broader European ripples (e.g., UK, Slovakia), but Scandinavia – especially Norway – remains a focal point due to elite/diplomatic ties. Probes are ongoing, and more details could emerge as files are analyzed. No evidence of criminal charges yet in Scandinavia, but corruption angles are serious.


 

The Epstein fallout in Scandinavia – so far

February 3, 2026

@grok

ktwop:

There seems to have been a significant Scandinavian fallout from the Epstein files. What is the actual Scandinavian fallout so far?

grok: 

The Epstein files, which include millions of pages of documents released by the U.S. Department of Justice in early 2026, have revealed various connections between Jeffrey Epstein and individuals in Scandinavian countries (Norway, Sweden, and Denmark). These mentions primarily involve emails, messages, and references to meetings or communications, but they do not include direct accusations of criminal wrongdoing against the named Scandinavians. The fallout has been limited to public apologies, regrets, and one confirmed resignation, with no major legal actions or abdications reported as of February 3, 2026. Below is a breakdown by country, based on verified reports.

Norway

  • Crown Princess Mette-Marit: She is mentioned extensively in the files (over 1,000 times in some analyses), with emails and messages showing repeated contact between 2011 and at least 2014 – longer and more frequent than she previously admitted in a 2019 apology. Examples include her calling Epstein a “sweetheart,” joking about adultery, and discussing topics like “wife hunt” trips. She visited his Palm Beach property and used his staff for travel arrangements. In response to the 2026 releases, Mette-Marit issued a statement expressing regret, calling the association “simply embarrassing” and acknowledging poor judgment. Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre publicly agreed with her self-assessment, stating she showed “poor judgment.” The Norwegian royal palace has denied any financial ties or deeper involvement, and there have been no calls for her to step down.
  • Other connections: Former Norwegian Prime Minister Thorbjørn Jagland (also former Nobel Committee chair and Council of Europe secretary-general) is referenced in messages with Epstein about politics, but no wrongdoing is alleged, and he has not commented or faced consequences.
  • No resignation: No Norwegian official has resigned due to the files. However, Ambassador Mona Juul—a celebrated Norwegian diplomat known for her pivotal role in brokering the 1990s Oslo Accords—was temporarily suspended from her duties on that date pending an investigation into her alleged ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
  • Broader impact: The revelations have coincided with unrelated scandals involving Mette-Marit’s stepson, Marius Borg Høiby, who faces 38 criminal charges including rape and assault (trial began February 2, 2026). This has amplified media scrutiny on the Norwegian royals, described by some historians as the biggest scandal in Norway’s modern royal history, but it’s not directly linked to Epstein.

Sweden

  • Princess Sofia: She is referenced in the files, but details are limited to mentions without specifics of meetings or wrongdoing. The Swedish royal court has denied any involvement or attendance at Epstein-related events. No public statement from Sofia has been reported, and there has been no significant backlash or calls for her to step back from duties.
  • UN official resignation: Joanna Rubinstein (sometimes spelled Rubinstein in sources) resigned on February 2, 2026, from her position as chair of Sweden for UNHCR—the fundraising arm of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in Sweden.
  • Other connections: The files allege a Swedish man (not named in summaries) helped recruit women for Epstein over years, but no confirmed identities or actions have led to fallout. Barbro C. Ehnbom, a Swedish leadership program organizer, is mentioned in emails with Epstein post-2008, but no consequences reported.
  • Broader impact: Public discussion has been muted, with the royal family focusing on family events amid the controversy.

Denmark

  • King Frederik (formerly Crown Prince): He is mentioned in 2012 emails between Epstein and businessman Ian Osborne, but without details of direct contact or wrongdoing. The Danish royal family has downplayed or denied any direct/recent ties.
  • Rumors about business leaders and politicians: No confirmed connections or fallout in the files or subsequent reports. Speculation exists online (e.g., about elite networks), but nothing substantiated has led to resignations or investigations.
  • Broader impact: Minimal public reaction; the mentions have not escalated into scandals.
Overall, the Scandinavian fallout remains contained to reputational damage and one resignation, with royals issuing statements of regret or denial.

No evidence of pregnancies, financial payouts, or deeper involvement (as rumored in some X posts) has been confirmed in official releases or reporting.

The files continue to be analyzed, so further developments are possible.


Andrew – Prince of beggars

March 21, 2011

The Telegraph does not much like Prince Andrew and his venal ways. The Duke of York receives a £249,000 annuity from the Queen.  Last year the prince spent £620,000 as a trade envoy, including £154,000 on hotels, food and hospitality and £465,000 on travel.

Randy Andy

First there was the sale of his home in Berkshire to Kazakhstan president’s billionaire son-in-law Timur Kulibayev, for £15 million: £3 million over the asking price, although there hadn’t been a single prospective buyer in three years. It now sits unoccupied and in mounting disrepair, suggesting that the property, curiously, isn’t particularly essential to Mr Kulibayev’s portfolio.

There is the Duke’s 16-year friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, an American billionaire who was jailed for 18 months in 2008 for soliciting under-age prostitutes. The Duke – who was snapped in 2001 with a cheery arm around Virginia Roberts, Epstein’s 17-year-old “masseuse” – was also photographed strolling in Central Park with Epstein last December, after the latter was released from jail. Shortly afterwards, Epstein stepped in to pay off £15,000 of the Duchess of York’s debts, a matter which the Duke had reportedly been finessing during the trip.

The Duke of York has been engulfed in a new “cash-for-favours” row after a close friend paid off £50,000 of his ex-wife’s debts. David Rowland, a financier once described as “shady” in Parliament, gave the sum to the Duchess of York’s former press spokesman Kate Waddington, whom the Duchess owed in the region of £85,000.

In May 2010, the Duchess of York, the Prince’s ex-wife, was filmed by a News of the World reporter claiming that Prince Andrew had agreed that if she were to receive £500,000, he, the Prince, would meet the donor and pass on useful top level business contacts. She was filmed receiving, in cash, $40,000 as a down payment. The Prince’s entourage denied he knew of the situation

It would seem that one part of his activities as the UK’s Trade envoy is soliciting money from rather dubious people for the repayment of his ex-wife’s debts. She is also not slow to sell access to him – for whatever it is worth. No doubt there is a point of view that for this scion of the House of Windsor to do his utmost to repay his ex-wife’s debts is an extremely honourable thing to do.

His elder brother and heir to the throne is the epitome of silliness and no great credit to his House either but at least he does not seem to be venal.

I think we are half way up now.

Neither up nor down

Oh, The grand old Duke of York,
He had ten thousand men;
He marched them up to the top of the hill,
And he marched them down again.

And when they were up, they were up,
And when they were down, they were down,
And when they were only half-way up,
They were neither up nor down.